The content on this page will not be updated after June 30, 2006.

General College is now the Department of Postsecondary Teaching and Learning in the College of Education and Human Development.

Skip to main content.Return to: General College : U of M Home

Gold University of Minnesota M. Skip to main content.University of Minnesota. Home page.
 
CTAD. Curriculum Transformation and Disability.

What's inside.

About CTAD

Publications

Related Resources



 
 

CTAD Home



Curriculum Transformation and Disability is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education. Project # P333A990015.
 
  CTAD Home

Annotated Bibliography

 
 Technology and Disability

Selected software for developing and remediating difficulties in mathematics for adults with learning disabilities, Latest Developments, Fall 1995, 2-3.

This is a list of software material that can help students with disabilities and instructors make students more successful.

Bohman, P. (2000) Universal design and disability access to he web. Internet: http://www.webaim.org/articles/webnet2000

Bohman begins by stressing the need for Internet content to be more accessible to diverse audiences because in doing so the disabled community will reap the most benefits. This article reinforces the importance for those with disabilities to have full accessibility to the Internet. Without full accessibility persons with disabilities will lose out on a great amount of information as more and more people use the Internet as their main source of information dissemination. The author offers sources for some current solutions of web accessibility. Finally, the issue of universal design is addressed and the author discusses how more consideration of this concept will open new avenues to ensure equal access for all.

Burgstahler, S. Comden, D. & Fraser, B. (1997). Universal access: Designing and evaluating web sites for accessibility, Choice, 34, 19-22.

This article offers principles for universal design in evaluating and creating web sites to ensure that Internet users with disabilities, and from all backgrounds, have equal access despite limitations. They talk about general page design, graphical features, and special features. They begin by offering suggestions for a general page design. The authors first suggest that Web sites have a clear and consistent page layout that is very organized throughout. Graphic-intensive and text based versions of Web sites should be maintained but not constantly changing in format. Another suggestion is to use backgrounds that are simple with sufficient contrast. This helps people who have vision problems. Using standard HTML is also important because it ensures that the content of the web site can be accessed by all browsers used by those who visit the site. Also it is a good idea to use large buttons for easy access to links on the web page. Then the authors suggest containing a note in the Web site about accessibility and encouraging users to contact you with any concerns about accessibility.

The next suggestions for web pages mentioned in the article are graphical features that include text alternatives for those who have vision difficulties. The authors recommend the following: use short (less than 5 words) descriptive ALT attributes for all graphical features on the web page; make embedded links easy to get to by using image maps called ISMAPS; include descriptive captions for pictures and transcriptions of manuscript images (which aids those who speak English as a second language and those with learning disabilities) in order to provide alternative methods of obtaining information; and, make links descriptive in order to aid someone if they want to use them out of context.

Then the authors offer a list of tips for including special features in web design. They suggest that the use of tables should only be used rarely but to use alternative formats so those with visual impairments can access data. Web site designers should consider, and test, alternatives for forms and databases to ensure equal access for those who cannot use forms. Finally, the authors mention that Web site designers should beware of applets and plug-ins to ensure that those with vision and hearing impairments can access information.

The authors conclude by saying that a web page test is important with as many browsers as possible and then they offer resources about Web sites. The information offered in this article is useful for professors who post a lot of course material on the web for their students.

Chickering, A.W., & Ehrmann, S.C. (1996, October). Implementing the seven principles: technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin, pp. 3-6.

The authors outline ways to use information technologies to advance Chickering's previously described "Seven Principles for Good Undergraduate Education", arguing that, for these new technologies to be used to their full potential, they have to be used in accordance with the Seven Principles. The Seven Principles and their relationship to these new technologies are as follows:

  1. "Good Practice Encourages Contacts Between Students and Faculty." The use of email, computer conferencing, etc., allows for more interaction with students and encourages greater participation from a wider range of students.
  2. "Good Practice Develops Reciprocity and Cooperation Among Students." Computer mediated collaborative learning, discussion, etc., can strengthen cooperation among students.
  3. "Good Practice Uses Active Learning Techniques." New technologies support "apprentice-like activities", such as design simulation software, in fields that require the use of technology.
  4. "Good Practice Gives Prompt Feedback." New technologies offer prompt feedback through email, but also through means such as videotape, and computer based portfolio assessment.
  5. "Good Practice Emphasizes Time on Task." New technologies offer easier access to resources, such as online library databases, and make them available at convenient hours.
  6. "Good Practice Communicates High Expectations." Knowing their work will be "published" on the web, for example, may encourage students to achieve more.
  7. "Good Practice Respects Diverse Talents and Ways of Learning." Students can learn in ways most effective to them because technology can offer different methods of learning (visuals, print, virtual experiences, etc.)

Day, S.L., and Edwards, B.J. (1996). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(5), 486-492.

This article discusses issues related to accommodation strategies involving assistive technology devices (ATD). The use of these aids for compensatory and remedial purposes is discussed. The authors talk about how learning disabled students benefit most from technology that helps compensate for difficulties that their disability may pose, thus alleviating some of the frustration and anxiety encountered. The paucity of research on the effectiveness of certain technologies for different types of learning disabilities is mentioned.

As well as briefly describing disability related legislation, the authors also discuss litigation related to ATD provision. They note that there have been some out-of court settlements, but no litigation relating to ATD provision. Actions which could result in litigation are discussed.

The authors discuss historic barriers to ATD provision and how some of these barriers have been ameliorated. Current college and University programs for assistive technology provision are discussed as well as issues in choosing ATD devices and training students how to use them. Seven general training strategies applicable to all learning disabled students are presented.

The information in this article may be more relevant to institutional-level service provision planning, rather than classroom-level curriculum planning. However, the article does promote a better understanding of why such accommodations are so important for learning disabled students.

Fichten, C., Barile, M. & Asuncion, J. (1999). Learning technologies: Students with disabilities in postsecondary education - Final report to the Office of Learning Technologies. Adaptech Project - Dawson College - Montreal, Spring 1999, pp. 9-12; 171-174.

This article discusses how computers can help or deny people with disabilities in the Canadian community. The researchers in this article deal with issues regarding the use of computers and how it meets the needs of individuals in postsecondary education with disabilities, their professors, and other personnel. They did these investigations by using a bilingual focus group in the Montreal area that consisted of 31 participants. They addressed issues of the effectiveness of computers, information, and adaptive technologies by postsecondary students with disabilities. They also used telephone interviews from across the country and mailed questionnaires to student groups. After all this information was collected, they discovered a few things: that colleges had more students with disabilities than universities, that these students use computer technology to help them succeed, and that service providers are beneficial for students and cost effective for the university. Additionally, about half of the students surveyed had more than one disability suggesting the need for workstations to be adaptive. Furthermore, the high cost of computers was a common issue for students. Most of these students didn't know about Canada's program to help them obtain a computer at home, which suggests that there is a need for more outreach work to help better inform students. This study indicates that students with disabilities use computers to help them be more successful. The authors make recommendations for faculty at colleges and universities which include things such as: asking the student what would help them learn better, asking various personnel in disability services for better solutions, using outlines on the web, making web sites universally accessible, and making material presented in the class accessible on the web. They also give suggestions on how to make web sites accessible for the hearing impaired and those with learning disabilities, and how to make written materials available in alternative formats. This article gives good tips to instructors on how to make their class more user friendly.

Knox, D.L., Higbee, J.L., Kalivoda, K.S., & Totty, M.C. (DATE) Serving the diverse needs of students with disabilities through technology. Unpublished manuscript, the Univ. of GA.

This article provides a wealth of practical advice on the use and availability of new technologies and their educational applications. The authors point out that faculty bear most of the responsibility for making their own classes accessible and argue that the work that goes into this process should be taken into consideration by administrators who make decisions on matters such as teaching loads and tenure. The article examines in detail a number of new technologies and their educational applications, including the Kurzweil Reading Edge, Screen Reader Software, Braille Computer Output Devices, Real Time Captioning, and Dictation and Voice Recognition Software Programs, among others. The detailed descriptions should provide faculty with a much clearer sense of how these technologies work and how they could be applied in specific disciplines.

Riviere, A. (1996). Assistive technology: Meeting the needs of adults with learning disabilities. Academy for Educational Development, Inc. ERIC Document No. ED401686

The author offers an overview and guide for assistive technology devices that learning disabled students may use in various settings. First, the discussion begins with an overview of various disability laws. Then ideas are offered to help students with organizational skills, memory, managing personal information, time management, and staying on task. Devices range from simple things such as highlighters to personal data managers and free-form databases. For learning disabled adults that experience challenges with auditory/listening skills, the author offers a separate list of assistive technologies. Suggestions for technological devices for visual processing, math, reading, and written language are given. Then a section titled "Beyond the Basics" covers suggestions for those with problems in directionality (maps, legends, street signs, etc). Along with that is a multimedia and telecommunication/distance learning section. Finally a list of services and resources targeted toward those making accommodations (teachers and employers) is given. This article is useful for the learning disabled in various settings as well as those who work with them and/or provide services.

Web Accessibility in Mind (WebAIM). Acrobat and PowerPoint accessibility woes. Internet: http://www.webaim.org/articles/pdfandppt

The high usage of PowerPoint and Acrobat readers is helpful for many people, but is inaccessible for those who are blind and/or depend on screen readers. The authors discuss the problems with these programs and the issues involved in making such files more accessible. They say that these programs require work from manufacturers to relieve the imperfections and stress the need for these changes. Nevertheless, tips are given to help alleviate some of them. This article provides some information for those who use these technologies frequently.

 
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.